|
Resources >
Discussions > Use of the AMA Guides
The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment is the most widely used basis for
determining impairment. They are used in state workers’ compensation systems,
federal systems, automobile casualty and personal injury.
They are used in the majority of state workers’
compensation jurisdictions.
Twelve states make
use of the Fifth Edition, published in 2000: California, Delaware,
Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho,
Iowa, Kentucky, Nevada, New
Hampshire,
Ohio, Vermont and Washington.
Sixteen states use the Sixth Edition which was released at
the end of 2007: Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana,
Massachusetts, Mississippi,
Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, Tennessee and Wyoming. (Connecticut, Indiana
and Massachusetts do not stipulate which Edition of the
Guides
to use and are therefore listed as the latest
Edition.)
Eight states still commonly make use of the Fourth Edition
(published in 1993): Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Maine,
Maryland, South Dakota, Texas, and West
Virginia. Colorado uses the Third Edition, Revised
(published in 1990).
Seven states use their own state
specific guidelines (Florida, Minnesota, New
York, North Carolina, Oregon, Utah and Wisconsin) and six states do
not specify a specific guideline (Michigan, Missouri,
Nebraska, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Virginia).
Statutes may or may not specify which edition of the
Guides to use and how the Guides are to be utilized.
Some states may use their own guidelines for specific
problems and use the Guides for other problems. Many
states use a statutory schedule for amputations, hearing
loss, visual loss, hernias, and disfigurement. Some
states may use a statutory schedule and use the Guides
for nonscheduled injuries and others do not specify the
use of any specific guidelines.
The Guides are also used to rate impairment
beyond state workers’ compensation laws. In these other
arenas the Sixth Edition, the most current edition,
should be used. The Sixth Edition is used for Federal
Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA) which covers federal
employees (including postal workers) and citizens of
Washington, DC. Under FECA 5 USC 8107 benefit is given
for permanent impairment to specific body parts
including extremities, hearing, vision, and loss of
specific organs (breast, kidney, larynx, lung, penis,
testicle, tongue, ovary, and uterus/cervix and
vulva/vagina). Awards are based on a formula of 66 2/3
percent of monthly wages multiplied by a specified
numbers of weeks’ compensation for a specific body part;
for the upper extremity this includes arm, hand, and
individual digits. Under the Longshore and Harbor
Workers’ Compensation Act ratings are performed for
“scheduled injuries” (e.g., a scheduled member of the
body defined by section 8(c)(1)-(20) of the LHWCA). This
includes upper extremity injuries (with the exception of
the shoulder), lower extremity injuries, and hearing
loss.
The Guides are often used to quantify the extent of
injuries resulting from an automobile casualty or
personal injury. Insurers may use an impairment rating
as one of the factors in determining the reserving or
settlement value of a claim. Attorneys may use this to
quantify the impact of an injury. With no-fault
insurance some states may restrict suits to cases where
a specific defined threshold has been met; in these
states the Guides play an important role. Florida, for
example, has a no-fault system for automobile insurance.
Where personal injury protection (PIP) coverage exists,
an insured’s claims for pain and suffering are subject
to threshold limitations as a basis for recovery outside
the automobile no-fault system. The Guides are commonly
used in Florida automobile casualty cases to define
“significant and permanent loss of an important bodily
function.”
Use of the AMA Guides in State Workers Compensation
contact us if you have updated information regarding your State):
|
State
|
Edition most commonly used |
Statute / Code |
Comment
|
|
Alabama
|
4th |
AL § 480-5-5-.35 |
The 4th edition is the "recommended guide" to be
used by physicians. |
|
Alaska
|
6th |
AK S. §. 23.30.190 |
Statutes state new edition
to be adopted by board within 90 days of the last day of the month when
the new edition is published. The use of the Sixth Edition was required as
of March 31, 2008. |
|
Arizona
|
6th |
AZ Rev. S. Ann. §
23-1044;
§
23-1065;
Rule R20-5-113(B) of the Workers' Compensation Practice and Procedure
|
Use of most recent edition specified by administrative regulation. Guides are used to support
medical opinion and in supplementing Arizona’s statutory disability
schedule. |
|
Arkansas
|
4th
|
Workers' Compensation Commission
Rule 099.34 - Impairment Rating Guide |
Excludes
any sections that refer to pain and exclusive of
straight leg raising tests or range of motion
tests when making physical or anatomical
impairment ratings to the spine. |
|
California
|
5th
|
CA Code of Reg. Title 8, Ch. 4.5 Sub Ch. 1 Art.
7 |
California Permanent Disability Rating Schedule, an impairment-based rating system which is based
on the 5th edition and modifies ratings based on adjustments for Future
Earning Capacity, occupational demands and age. 5th adopted as of
January 1, 2005. California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board issued a
decision February 2009 in the consolidated cases
of
Almaraz v. SCIF, et al. and Guzman v.
Milpitas Unified School District that the AMA
Guides were rebuttable.
|
|
Colorado
|
3rd revised |
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-42-101 |
Legislation maintains the
use of the 3rd edition revised. |
|
Connecticut
|
6th
|
Public Meeting of the Workers’ Compensation
Commissioners |
The
physician who is doing a rating must use an
“objective” standard. The state recommends use
of the AMA Guides but specifically does not
require use of a specific edition. |
|
Delaware
|
5th
|
Title 19, Ch. 23 |
Not
required by statute but are strongly favored
including in case law. |
|
District of Columbia
|
|
DC Code: 32-1508 (3)(U-i)
|
Not mandated: "... the most recent edition of
the American Medical Association's Guides to the
Evaluation of Permanent Impairment may be
utilized..." |
|
Florida
|
State Specific |
1996 Florida Uniform Permanent Impairment Rating
Schedule
69L-7.604 |
State specific guide,
however incorporated some principles from the 4th edition. Not anticipating
use of AMA Guides. |
|
Georgia
|
5th
|
GA Code Ann. § 34-9-263(d)
(Ch. 9 Art. 37) |
5th edition adopted as of July 1, 2001. |
|
Hawaii
|
5th
|
|
Uses
latest edition but has not moved to 6th edition yet.
Also uses a schedule and rules for rating nonscheduled disability.
|
|
Idaho
|
5th
|
|
Uses the 5th edition as
medical evidence, neither regulation nor statute require it. |
|
Illinois
|
6th
|
820 ILCS § 305/1 |
Moved to the 6th Edition for injuries suffered
on 9/1/11 or thereafter. |
|
Indiana |
6th
|
Guide To Indiana Workers' Compensation |
The Guide to Indiana Workers’ Compensation
states “Physicians use the American Medical
Association’s Guides to the Evaluation of
Permanent Impairment in evaluating the
employee’s impairment rating. |
|
Iowa
|
5th
|
IA
Code, §876-2.4(85);
|
Adopted for determining permanent partial
disabilities under Iowa Code section
85.34(2)"a" to "s". "Nothing in this rule
shall be construed to prevent the presentations
of other medical opinions or other
material evidence for the purpose of
establishing that the degree of permanent
disability to which the claimant would be
entitled would be more or less than the
entitlement indicated in the Fifth Edition of
the AMA guides."
Deferred going to the 6th edition. |
|
Kansas
|
4th
|
KS
Stat. § 44-510d,
KS
Stat. § 44-510e |
Not known if
later edition
will be used in the future. |
|
Kentucky
|
5th
|
KY Rev. Stat. § 342.0011
(35); |
|
|
Louisiana
|
6th
|
LA Rev. Stat. Ann. § 23:1221.(4)(q) |
Statute mandates that most
recent version of the Guides should be utilized. |
|
Maine
|
4th
|
WCB Rules & Regulations
Rule 90-351. ME Title 39-A, 153 § 8
|
4th edition specified. No
plans to use 5th edition at this time. |
|
Maryland
|
4th
|
MD Title 14.09.04.01
|
Changing to the 5th edition is not planned at
this time. |
|
Massachusetts
|
6th
|
MA Gen. Law Title XXI Ch. 152, § 36
|
Edition not specified.
Incorporates Guides by statute, requiring its use when certain criteria
are met for permanent conditions. |
|
Michigan
|
Not Specified |
Worker's Disability Compensation Act of 1969
$418.361 |
Scheduled amputations and
total permanent disabilities are listed in law. |
|
Minnesota
|
State Specific |
Stat. Ch. 176.101 |
State specific schedule of
permanent partial disabilities used. |
|
Mississippi
|
6th
|
Fee Schedule: IV Impairment Rating 'A' |
"In determining the extent of permanent
impairment attributable to a compensable injury,
the provider shall base this determination on
the most current edition of the Guides ... which
is in effect at the time the service is
rendered." |
|
Missouri
|
Not Specified |
Ch. 287 Rev. Stat. |
No guide for nonscheduled
injuries, but ratings from Guides may be used. |
|
Montana
|
6th
|
MT Code Ann. §39-71-711(b) |
Current edition specified. |
|
Nebraska
|
Not Specified
|
NE Stat. § 48-121 |
Guides not specified, however
commonly used as a predicate for disability. |
|
Nevada
|
5th
|
NV
Rev. Stat. 616C.110
|
5th edition used as of October 2003. |
|
New Hampshire |
5th
|
NH Rev. Stat. Ann. § 281-A:32;
|
Most recent edition was previously specified,
however legislation in July 2008 removed this
requirement and specified ratings are to be
performed by the 5th edition with the exception
of workers who achieved MMI between January 1
and June 25, 2008 who will be evaluated by the
6th edition. |
|
New Jersey |
Not Specified |
NJ Stat. Ann. § 34:15-12 |
Permanent disability is based upon the objective
medical evidence of a disability as well as the
injured worker’s testimony. |
|
New Mexico |
6th
|
NM Stat. Ann. § 52-1-24
|
Most recent edition specified. |
|
New York |
State Specific |
Medical Guidelines |
Uses own
Disability Guidelines,
not anticipating use of Guides |
|
North Carolina |
State Specific |
NC Stat. 97, WCA 97-31 |
Use on guides presented in
the NC Workers Compensation
Rating Guide. |
|
North Dakota |
5th
|
ND Cent Code § 65-05-12-2
|
Guides are modified to be consistent with ND
law, to resolve issues of practice and
interpretation, and to address areas not
sufficiently covered by the guides. Subject to
rules adopted under this subsection, impairments
must be evaluated under the 6th edition of the
Guides. |
|
Ohio
|
5th
|
OH Rev. Code § 4123 |
|
|
Oklahoma
|
6th
|
OK Stat.
Title 85-3.19 |
Specifies "latest publication".
|
|
Oregon
|
State Specific
|
OR Admin. Rules Ch. 436, Div. 035 |
"Oregon does not reference any particular
edition of the AMA Guides, nor does the usage of
the AMA Guides for rating disability currently
hold any legal standing in Oregon Workers
Compensation." |
|
Pennsylvania
|
6th
|
34 Pa. Code § 123.105. |
Most recent edition specified. |
|
Rhode Island
|
6th
|
RI Gen. Laws § 28-29-2 |
In January 2011, the
Sixth Edition became effective. It is specified in determining “Loss of
Use”. This provision applies to injuries that
occur on and after January 1, 2011. |
|
South Carolina
|
Not Specified |
SC Reg. Sec. 67-1101 |
"The method
for determining hearing impairment is based on
the American Academy of Otolaryngology "Guide
for Evaluation of Hearing Handicap", copyright
1979, which is based upon the American Medical
Association's "Guides to the Evaluation of
Permanent Impairment", copyright 1977.
"
|
|
South Dakota |
4th
|
SD Codified Law 62-1-1.2 |
4th edition required by
statute. Not known when and if later will be used |
|
Tennessee
|
6th
|
TN Code Ann. § 50-6-102
and 50-6-204 |
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102 provides: (2)"AMA
guides" means the 6th edition of the American
Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of
Permanent Impairment, American Medical
Association, until a new edition is designated
by the general assembly in accordance with §
50-6-204(d)(3)(C). The edition that is in effect
on the date the employee is injured is the
edition that shall be applicable to the claim. |
|
Texas
|
4th
|
TX Lab. Code Ann. §
408.124
|
As of 10/15/01, 4th edition
required |
|
Utah
|
State Specific |
Rule 612-7-3
Method for Rating
Utah's Impairment Guides |
For rating all impairments, which are not
expressly listed in
Section 34A-2-412, the Commission adopts
Utah’s 2006 Impairment Guides as published by
the Commission for all ratings of impairments on
or after January 1, 2006. For those conditions
or exclusions not found in Utah’s 2006
Impairment Guides, the Guides are to be used. |
|
Vermont
|
5th
|
VT Stat. Ann. Tit. 21, § 648
|
Legislation specifies continued use of 5th Edition vs. moving to the 6th Edition. |
|
Virginia
|
Not Specified |
VI § 65.2-503 |
Guides most often used as
source of impairment rating. No specific guide mentioned in statute or
regulation. |
|
Washington
|
5th
|
WAC 296-23-381
WAC 296-20-220
|
State
specific guidelines for certain conditions, 5th
edition used for loss of function of
extremities, partial loss of vision or hearing. |
|
West Virginia
|
4th
|
WV Title §85-20-3 |
Code specifies 4th Edition. |
|
Wisconsin
|
State Specific |
WI Adm. Code 80.32, 80.33;
WI Stat.
Ch. 102 |
Not anticipating use of Guides. State specific
schedules provided for rating. |
|
Wyoming
|
6th
|
WY Stat § 27-14-405(g) |
Most recent edition
specified. |
|
US Federal Programs
– FECA |
6th
|
|
Most recent edition of specified. |
|
US Federal Programs – Longshore |
6th
|
|
Most recent edition of specified. |
|